<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for café theology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cafetheology.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cafetheology.org</link>
	<description>Discussion Group</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on St. Ignatius of Antioch by Faith Intersecting Culture</title>
		<link>http://cafetheology.org/2008/10/17/st-ignatius-of-antioch-4/#comment-26960</link>
		<dc:creator>Faith Intersecting Culture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 14:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafetheology.org/?p=3886#comment-26960</guid>
		<description>[...] good quote to start the day - A Christian is not his own master, since all his time belongs to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] good quote to start the day - A Christian is not his own master, since all his time belongs to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on St. Gemma Galgani by gdallaire1</title>
		<link>http://cafetheology.org/2008/09/13/st-gemma-galgani/#comment-26428</link>
		<dc:creator>gdallaire1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 22:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafetheology.org/?p=3754#comment-26428</guid>
		<description>Hello. Thank you for the beautiful quote from St Gemma.
I have a website devoted specifically to St Gemma Galgani and in it I have many quotes like this one from her writings including her autobiography, letters and diary, along with many portraits, photographs and other information pertaining to her life.
For those who are interested it is is located here:
http://stgemmagalgani.blogspot.com/

May God bless you,
Glenn Dallaire</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello. Thank you for the beautiful quote from St Gemma.<br />
I have a website devoted specifically to St Gemma Galgani and in it I have many quotes like this one from her writings including her autobiography, letters and diary, along with many portraits, photographs and other information pertaining to her life.<br />
For those who are interested it is is located here:<br />
<a href="http://stgemmagalgani.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://stgemmagalgani.blogspot.com/</a></p>
<p>May God bless you,<br />
Glenn Dallaire</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fun, Faith Filled Facts #9: Missing Sunday mass is a Mortal Sin? and so is&#8230;.. by Joe B</title>
		<link>http://cafetheology.org/2008/08/27/fun-faith-filled-facts-9-missing-sunday-mass-is-a-mortal-sin-and-so-is/#comment-26145</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 00:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafetheology.org/?p=3676#comment-26145</guid>
		<description>I have to take issue with "Drinking under the age of 21" of itself being a mortal sin. If Drunkenness is a mortal sin and the person is old enough to know right from wrong, then it is a sin and the age qualifier is not necessary. But if a 20 year old has a glass of wine at dinner I don't think just because the government says the legal age is 21 he is commiting a mortal sin.  Mortal sins are not dependent on the laws of man.  Otherwise drinking under 21 is a sin today but if the age is lowered (and recently some college presidents urged states to lower the legal age) the action is suddenly not a sin?  The legal age to drink is lower than 21 in some other countries and it used to be lower in the US. Does that mean whether a 20 year old having a drink is a mortal sin depends on the changing statutes of a particular jurisdiction? Of course, I am discussing having a drink or drinks without drunkeness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to take issue with &#8220;Drinking under the age of 21&#8243; of itself being a mortal sin. If Drunkenness is a mortal sin and the person is old enough to know right from wrong, then it is a sin and the age qualifier is not necessary. But if a 20 year old has a glass of wine at dinner I don&#8217;t think just because the government says the legal age is 21 he is commiting a mortal sin.  Mortal sins are not dependent on the laws of man.  Otherwise drinking under 21 is a sin today but if the age is lowered (and recently some college presidents urged states to lower the legal age) the action is suddenly not a sin?  The legal age to drink is lower than 21 in some other countries and it used to be lower in the US. Does that mean whether a 20 year old having a drink is a mortal sin depends on the changing statutes of a particular jurisdiction? Of course, I am discussing having a drink or drinks without drunkeness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on St. Peter Claver by St. Peter Claver &#124; Faith and Facts</title>
		<link>http://cafetheology.org/2008/09/09/st-peter-claver/#comment-26086</link>
		<dc:creator>St. Peter Claver &#124; Faith and Facts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 13:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafetheology.org/?p=3730#comment-26086</guid>
		<description>[...] St. Peter Claver &#124; café theology. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] St. Peter Claver | café theology. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fun, Faith Filled Facts #9: Missing Sunday mass is a Mortal Sin? and so is&#8230;.. by Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://cafetheology.org/2008/08/27/fun-faith-filled-facts-9-missing-sunday-mass-is-a-mortal-sin-and-so-is/#comment-25859</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 01:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafetheology.org/?p=3676#comment-25859</guid>
		<description>Well done, Genevieve!  However, I would like a little clarification on your ending list of "Mortal" sins.  Though certainly deeply sinful, not all of those strike me as ones regarding such grave matter that they would be considered mortal.  Also, keep in mind that we can really only judge whether a particular sin is of "grave matter"--only one third of the conditions necessary for a sin to be a mortal sin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done, Genevieve!  However, I would like a little clarification on your ending list of &#8220;Mortal&#8221; sins.  Though certainly deeply sinful, not all of those strike me as ones regarding such grave matter that they would be considered mortal.  Also, keep in mind that we can really only judge whether a particular sin is of &#8220;grave matter&#8221;&#8211;only one third of the conditions necessary for a sin to be a mortal sin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fun, Faith Filled Facts #9: Missing Sunday mass is a Mortal Sin? and so is&#8230;.. by reynor</title>
		<link>http://cafetheology.org/2008/08/27/fun-faith-filled-facts-9-missing-sunday-mass-is-a-mortal-sin-and-so-is/#comment-25812</link>
		<dc:creator>reynor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafetheology.org/?p=3676#comment-25812</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this post Geneviève, i am aware of the 3rd commandment and that missing mass is a sin but never connected the two in the same way that the article did.  This is an eye-opener for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this post Geneviève, i am aware of the 3rd commandment and that missing mass is a sin but never connected the two in the same way that the article did.  This is an eye-opener for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen by archbishop fulton sheen</title>
		<link>http://cafetheology.org/2008/06/20/archbishop-fulton-j-sheen/#comment-23125</link>
		<dc:creator>archbishop fulton sheen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 04:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafetheology.org/2008/06/20/archbishop-fulton-j-sheen/#comment-23125</guid>
		<description>[...] They alone can properly say, at the end of it, ???It is finished!??? ?? archbishop fulton J. Sheenhttp://cafetheology.org/2008/06/20/archbishop-fulton-j-sheen/Bishop Fulton J. SheenA heckler asked Bishop sheen a question about someone who had died. The Bishop [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] They alone can properly say, at the end of it, ???It is finished!??? ?? archbishop fulton J. Sheenhttp://cafetheology.org/2008/06/20/archbishop-fulton-j-sheen/Bishop Fulton J. SheenA heckler asked Bishop sheen a question about someone who had died. The Bishop [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rosary &#124; Outside Carnegie Hall by reynor</title>
		<link>http://cafetheology.org/2008/01/29/rosary-outside-carnegie-hall/#comment-18484</link>
		<dc:creator>reynor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafetheology.org/2008/01/29/rosary-outside-carnegie-hall/#comment-18484</guid>
		<description>Yes, Manny, may God bless those who had the courage to protest.  It was very inspiring to see the people out there in the cold praying together and singing hymns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Manny, may God bless those who had the courage to protest.  It was very inspiring to see the people out there in the cold praying together and singing hymns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rosary &#124; Outside Carnegie Hall by Manny</title>
		<link>http://cafetheology.org/2008/01/29/rosary-outside-carnegie-hall/#comment-18480</link>
		<dc:creator>Manny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafetheology.org/2008/01/29/rosary-outside-carnegie-hall/#comment-18480</guid>
		<description>Even just the descriptions of parts of the show are unbelievably disgusting. Has the intelligence and decency of American theater sunk so low that it has come up with this mindless trash?

May God bless those who had the courage to protest this attack on Christianity, decency, and intelligent thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even just the descriptions of parts of the show are unbelievably disgusting. Has the intelligence and decency of American theater sunk so low that it has come up with this mindless trash?</p>
<p>May God bless those who had the courage to protest this attack on Christianity, decency, and intelligent thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Confused and Confusing Language by Manny</title>
		<link>http://cafetheology.org/2008/02/12/confused-and-confusing-language/#comment-18479</link>
		<dc:creator>Manny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafetheology.org/2008/02/12/confused-and-confusing-language/#comment-18479</guid>
		<description>It's amazing the lengths of dishonesty that the pro-abortion movement will go to hide their murderous agenda. Now they are manipulating abortion figures to their benefit. They go so far as to claim that liberal abortion laws actually reduce the number of abortions! of course the figures they cite can never really accurately reflect (if they do at all) the number of early chemical abortions brought about by the use of RU-486 and other abortifacients such as the Pill and IUD. By redefining what an abortion is (and ignoring the abortions caused by abortifacients), they continhjue to deceive people. It's our duty to point this out and inform people of the existence of abortifacient contraceptives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s amazing the lengths of dishonesty that the pro-abortion movement will go to hide their murderous agenda. Now they are manipulating abortion figures to their benefit. They go so far as to claim that liberal abortion laws actually reduce the number of abortions! of course the figures they cite can never really accurately reflect (if they do at all) the number of early chemical abortions brought about by the use of RU-486 and other abortifacients such as the Pill and IUD. By redefining what an abortion is (and ignoring the abortions caused by abortifacients), they continhjue to deceive people. It&#8217;s our duty to point this out and inform people of the existence of abortifacient contraceptives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
