<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evangelicalism Today</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cafetheology.org/2007/11/02/evangelicalism-today/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cafetheology.org/2007/11/02/evangelicalism-today/</link>
	<description>Discussion Group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:02:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Monday Meanderings, 11/5/07 &#171; Ponder Anew</title>
		<link>http://cafetheology.org/2007/11/02/evangelicalism-today/comment-page-1/#comment-11133</link>
		<dc:creator>Monday Meanderings, 11/5/07 &#171; Ponder Anew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 03:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafetheology.org/2007/11/02/evangelicalism-today/#comment-11133</guid>
		<description>[...] Russell Moore of Southern, Denny Burke, John Franke, and Michael Horton) have a discussion of Evangelicalism Today. It’s a fascinating look at some different definitions of an evangelical, as well as the twists [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Russell Moore of Southern, Denny Burke, John Franke, and Michael Horton) have a discussion of Evangelicalism Today. It’s a fascinating look at some different definitions of an evangelical, as well as the twists [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Making Chutney &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How Evangelicalism gets in the way of being evangelical</title>
		<link>http://cafetheology.org/2007/11/02/evangelicalism-today/comment-page-1/#comment-11131</link>
		<dc:creator>Making Chutney &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How Evangelicalism gets in the way of being evangelical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 00:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafetheology.org/2007/11/02/evangelicalism-today/#comment-11131</guid>
		<description>[...] those interested in Evangelicalism, there&#8217;s a groovy discussion of where it&#8217;s at and where it&#8217;s going at Café Theology. It&#8217;s a good fly-on-the-wall read of several evangelical academics worrying [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] those interested in Evangelicalism, there&#8217;s a groovy discussion of where it&#8217;s at and where it&#8217;s going at Café Theology. It&#8217;s a good fly-on-the-wall read of several evangelical academics worrying [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shanemagee</title>
		<link>http://cafetheology.org/2007/11/02/evangelicalism-today/comment-page-1/#comment-11116</link>
		<dc:creator>shanemagee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 13:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafetheology.org/2007/11/02/evangelicalism-today/#comment-11116</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s refreshing to hear evangelical voices debating and discussing these issues. as one of evangelical heritage i struggle with labeling myself as one now having come through the rigors of theological academia and having lived long enough to experience several dark nights of the soul as well as having faced situations and people which have not fitted neatly into the neat theological categorisations with which i was raised. 

voices like john franke and others give me hope though and i am not yet willing to walk away from the family which spawned me and has given me such a deep appreciation for scripture among other things. i do, however, think that the present conversation within evangelicalism is exciting and vital. since nietzsche (perhaps kant) everything has changed. foundationalism is dead and gone and is, at last, recognised as such, even within conservative evangelical circles.

a response must be made. 

one option is to follow cornelius van til, william lane craig and alvin plantinga down a fairly familiar road or to branch off in the entirely new direction suggested by the likes of jean luc marion (and even derrida, zizek, badlieu et al). this latter route seems much more intellectually coherent, has a deeper grasp of the times and allows  the great god of scripture to maintain his ability to shock and offend us to a much greater degree than the &#039;god&#039; tamed by reason (&quot;that bitch goddess&quot; as luther called it!).

great conversation though. i will stay tuned for more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s refreshing to hear evangelical voices debating and discussing these issues. as one of evangelical heritage i struggle with labeling myself as one now having come through the rigors of theological academia and having lived long enough to experience several dark nights of the soul as well as having faced situations and people which have not fitted neatly into the neat theological categorisations with which i was raised. </p>
<p>voices like john franke and others give me hope though and i am not yet willing to walk away from the family which spawned me and has given me such a deep appreciation for scripture among other things. i do, however, think that the present conversation within evangelicalism is exciting and vital. since nietzsche (perhaps kant) everything has changed. foundationalism is dead and gone and is, at last, recognised as such, even within conservative evangelical circles.</p>
<p>a response must be made. </p>
<p>one option is to follow cornelius van til, william lane craig and alvin plantinga down a fairly familiar road or to branch off in the entirely new direction suggested by the likes of jean luc marion (and even derrida, zizek, badlieu et al). this latter route seems much more intellectually coherent, has a deeper grasp of the times and allows  the great god of scripture to maintain his ability to shock and offend us to a much greater degree than the &#8216;god&#8217; tamed by reason (&#8220;that bitch goddess&#8221; as luther called it!).</p>
<p>great conversation though. i will stay tuned for more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rest Stop &#171; Merging Lanes</title>
		<link>http://cafetheology.org/2007/11/02/evangelicalism-today/comment-page-1/#comment-11061</link>
		<dc:creator>Rest Stop &#171; Merging Lanes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 21:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafetheology.org/2007/11/02/evangelicalism-today/#comment-11061</guid>
		<description>[...] - Evangelicalism Today (café theology) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; Evangelicalism Today (café theology) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
